Stefano Brianza, DVM, PhD, Eng 1 , Vittoria Brighenti, Eng 1 , Ludovic Boure, DVM, MSc, DES, Diplomate ACVS & ECVS 1 , Victor Sprenger, Eng, PhD 1 , Simon Pearce, BVSc, PhD 1 , and Karsten Schwieger, Eng, PhD 1 1 AO Research Institute, Davos Platz, Switzerland Veterinary Surgery July 2010 39 5 601 - 608 Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a novel pin–sleeve cast (PSC) system for external fixation of distal limb fractures in horses and to compare it with the transfixation pin cast (TPC) system. Study Design: Experimental. Sample Population: One bone substitute each was used for the TPC and PSC systems. The PSC was tested in 4 configurations characterized by different pin preloads. Methods: Specimens were loaded in axial compression in the elastic range. Variables compared statistically were: bone substitute axial displacement and axial strain measured above implants with strain gauges. Pin preload was correlated with the variables investigated. Load to failure and a fatigue tests supplemented the investigation. Results: The PSC configuration with the highest pin preload showed a significantly lower axial displacement compared with the TPC. No significant differences were observed between all other PSC configurations and the TPC. All PSC systems had a significant decrease in recorded strain compared with the TPC system. Pin axial preload inversely correlated with axial displacement but had no effect on axial strain. In the failure test, the PSC encountered plastic deformation earlier than the TPC. In the fatigue test, the PSC ran >200,000 cycles. Conclusions: Preliminary in vitro tests showed that the PSC system significantly reduced peri-implant strain while concurrently having comparable axial displacement to the TPC system. Clinical Relevance: The PSC system has the potential to reduce the risk of pin loosening in horses.

• Equine
• External fixation